Download e-book State and Kurds in Turkey: The Question of Assimilation

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online State and Kurds in Turkey: The Question of Assimilation file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with State and Kurds in Turkey: The Question of Assimilation book. Happy reading State and Kurds in Turkey: The Question of Assimilation Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF State and Kurds in Turkey: The Question of Assimilation at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF State and Kurds in Turkey: The Question of Assimilation Pocket Guide.

The concentration of population allows for closer government monitoring the domestic terrorism frame , but it also advances the assimilation and industrializing aims of the socioeconomic frame. Infrastructure projects, likewise, improve the economic potential of the region, but they also allow easier military access and often serve to reroute long-existing transportation networks. By reinforcing all three of these standpoints at the same time, GAP provides increased political stability to the Turkish state, resulting in its widespread support, both through time and across the political spectrum.

The military supports GAP because it allows a military-oriented solution in the southeast seen through the terrorist framework. Various business groups support GAP because the socioeconomic framing of the problem opens up the economic potential of the region and increases opportunities for investments. By ignoring the underlying issues driving approaches to the "Kurdish question," such as the single-minded focus on a monoethnic Turkish nation, GAP allows the state to draw support from the maximum number of domestic groups without alienating any large constituency—except, of course, the Kurds.

The issue of the Turkish Kurds has bedeviled modern Turkey since its founding as a republic.

The State and Kurds in Turkey: The Question of Assimilation - M. Heper - Google книги

Historically, the answer to the question has been to deny the Kurds' existence and to pacify their communities through military force. Beginning in the s, political openings appeared to offer a new way forward, and the Southeast Anatolian Project GAP seemed to offer a method through which to solve it. These political openings quickly floundered, and GAP became a vehicle through which the answer to the "Kurdish question" remained stuck in traditional Kemalist attitudes toward the minority. The project provides a catchall solution to the three main ways in which the Kurdish problem is framed by the Turkish majority.

GAP can solve the problem of domestic terrorism by limiting internal travel and concentrating populations, making the Kurds easier to control. GAP can solve the problem of international terrorism by providing the Turkish government with a tool with which to threaten foreign nations and by making cross-border incursions more difficult. Finally, GAP can solve socioeconomic problems by encouraging economic growth in the region while forcibly assimilating the society. Initially an electrical generation project, GAP was sold as a way to improve the economic performance of Turkey and to build up the backward, underdeveloped southeastern region within the country.

This integration approach was also intended to allay many European human rights concerns about Turkey and to expedite the process of Turkish inclusion in the European Economic Community and later the European Union.

Navigation menu

Unfortunately, this has not proven to be the case. GAP has, in actuality, served as an alternative method of assimilation and government control over an area that is notorious throughout Turkish history for being difficult to dominate. Supported by other government policies, it encourages permanent displacement of Kurdish populations and the destruction of Kurdish culture. Even the regional socioeconomic improvements are implemented in a way that seeks to force the assimilation of the Kurdish population.

Despite limited openings within Turkish politics and society for the Kurdish population, GAP continues to provide policy expression to the Kemalist idea of a nation-state based on the single ethnic identity of Turk. Far from developing and integrating the Kurdish populations, GAP furthers the solution of Turkey's Kurdish problem by erasing the Kurds themselves. Robert Hatem received B. Mark Dohrmann received his B.

Tauris and Co. Barkey and Graham E. Barkey, ed. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. Pool and Velma I.

  1. Bibliographic Information.
  2. Viscous Flows. The Practical Use of Theory?
  3. The State and Kurds in Turkey.
  4. The state and Kurds in Turkey : the question of assimilation - Semantic Scholar.

Grover, ed. Reluctant Neighbor , p. Vajpey, ed.

Lorenz and Edward J. Middle East Quarterly. Roots of the Kurdish Problem Defining what is meant by a Kurd can be a difficult task. Turkey's Kurds in Modern Times Beginning in , Turkey's political order began to spiral out of control, leading the military to intervene and culminating in a coup, which led to the drafting of the constitution of Shortly after reassuming the office of prime minister, Demirel declared: Turkey's border, flag, and official language cannot be debated, but ethnic groups [sic] demand to retain their own ethnic identity and culture should not be rejected … They have their own history, language, and folklore.

Framing the Kurdish Problem The issue of how to manage the Turkish Kurds—specifically dealing with the reasons behind and solutions to the violence that recurs in predominantly Kurdish areas—is framed in one of three ways by the Turkish state. GAP and Framing the Kurdish Problem Internationally, GAP serves a public relations function, something that can be sold to foreign investors and governments to show that Turkey is attempting to make progress on human rights and environmental concerns.

Conclusion The issue of the Turkish Kurds has bedeviled modern Turkey since its founding as a republic. Is the U. Handing Northeast Syria to Turkey? Next for Turkey? Nuclear Weapons! I suggest you put down the pipe and go outside for a bit. It might do your political "analysis" some good. AKP a-new-party-based upon-the state-mind-against all the dangers to itself has been drawing an optimistic panorama of Turkey thorough its supporters including media and civil organisations.

So the army, some civil organisations and all other political parties back AKP in Kurdish cities. If it accomplishes the "mission completed" if not the game is over!!! In the ies all countries were working on assimilating their different language speaking populations to a standard language. The United States was giving new immigrants English names. France which has been the model for Turkish modernisation since banned the use of regional languages until the ies, when these languages were almost forgotten.

You are free to demand a different approach but what Turks think of when they hear the word Kurdish is the terrorist organisation PKK and find that the demands of such an organisation must be resisted. There will be no political pressure for compromise on Kurdish issues until an overwhelming majority of Kurds realize that terrorism is a disgusting thing which may not happen.

Unfortunately Kurdish nationalists do not seem to understand this point, insisting that terrorism is Ok as long as the government does not do what they are ordering.

Kemal Ataturk and the Turkish Pashas did the same to the Kurds to establish the Turkish republic in Although the political reasons that had led to their deportation were not overtly mentioned in this instruction, it reveals how the settlement practices were deployed by the Republic in line with the political measures.

Another direction issued by the Ministry points to the attention given to the settlement of the Caucasian immigrants and illuminates the suspicious attitude of nationalist elite against them. This direction limited the settlement districts of Georgian and Azeri immigrants and it rejected of the immigration of White Russians This law made it obligatory to inhabit for five years in the areas of settlement specified by the government. In fact, before the adoption of this law, the Ministry had already been concerned with this issue. For example, it was figured out that 44 exchangees from Drama, who had been settled in Samsun, went to İstanbul without permission.

As a result, the Ministry ordered the transfer of these exchangees from İstanbul to Samsun with a directive issued on January 29, Furthermore, on March 6, , it published a special instruction that ordered the settlement of the exchangees of Greece to the places assigned in the agreement By means of this law, it attempted to fix the places of immigrants where they had been settled. Alongside the Albanians, Bosnians, Pomaks and Roma people, the government was cautious in settling the exchangees from Crete. This policy continued to be carried out in the subsequent years.

In practice, however, this could not be realized successfully and the Ministry of Exchange, Reconstruction and Settlement became the target of harsh criticism in the Turkish Grand National Assembly. How many immigrants and exchangees had been settled? How much reconstruction had been made and where? Some of the critiques were related to the material difficulties, administrative mistakes and improprieties, which resulted in casualties and material losses not only of the exchangees but also of the other immigrants and the homeless people Aktar Alongside these problems, the Ministry was found unsuccessful in settling non-Turkish-speaking immigrants in accordance with the policy of assimilation.

One of the most important critiques directed at the Ministry was the admission of Albanians as exchangees and their collective settlement in İstanbul and İzmir Nevertheless, the critics were not confined to Albanian speakers.

Account Options

This is a gross error. They settled the incomers of Yanya from Gekbuze towards here. However, if there is a language different from Turkish in the areas inhabited by the overwhelming Turkish majority, we must isolate it Applauds. They settled the Greek speaking masses right across the sea from the islands.

A grave mistake! Among the people inhabited on the coast, the dominant dance is Polka instead of our national dance; the dominant musical instruments are the mandolin and the bagpipe instead of our national instruments; the dominant languages are Albanian and Bosnian instead of our national language. Is this, too, a question of appropriations?

Such critiques did not only target the Albanian-speakers but also Bosnians, Roma people, Pomaks, Circassians and immigrants from Crete. Approximately one month after this parliamentary debate, on December 11, , the Ministry of Exchange, Reconstruction and Settlement was closed and its duties were delegated to the Department of Settlement created under the Ministry of Interior I wonder, why we do not compel, why we do not oppress.

Why do the Albanians who have come here speak Albanian? Why does Bosniak speak Bosniak and Circassian speaks Circassian? It was one of the most important pieces of legislations of the s, designed in accordance with the mentality of social engineering This law included significant stipulations for the settlement not only of immigrants but also of nomadic tribes, and the Roma population of Turkish nationality as well.

The state and Kurds in Turkey : the question of assimilation

Article 1 leaves the decisions about settlement regions of the immigrants, who came to Turkey individually or collectively, to the initiative of the Ministry of Interior. Nevertheless, according to Article 3, the settlement of the nomadic individuals and tribes is left to the decision of the Council of Ministers, which is to be implemented by the Ministry of Interior. There is also an important provision for the Roma people. During this period, the Ministry of Interior took caution in settling the immigrants in accordance with the goal of nationalization. For this reason, the Ministry tried to learn the linguistic and ethnic composition of the provinces to designate the appropriate places for the relocation of refugees.

This is a very detailed report including a table with information about nationality on a street-by-street level. It carefully distinguished the Turkish and non-Turkish-speaking nomads. They had been brought back to Mersin in accordance with the aforementioned law making obligatory for the settled people not to change the original settlement places.